fbpx

Google Clarifies that Nofollow Change Was a Policy Update with No Action Taken

author image Written by: Nicole McCormick           Categories - In The News

Google Confirms They Have Not Made Use of Nofollow Link Update

Just when you thought you’d heard the last about Google’s recent nofollow link change, Google decided it wanted to have the last word on the matter by speaking out about some confusion surrounding the change. The change, which allowed Google to treat the nofollow link attribute as a hint, rather than a directive, for ranking, crawling and indexing purposes, was rolled out on March 1st. However, shortly before the rollout, Google Webmaster Trends Analyst, John Mueller, stated on Twitter that he didn’t anticipate the change having an impact on sites. https://twitter.com/JohnMu/status/1233369331561615361 Other than that, we didn’t have much more to go on, so we were forced to just take Mueller’s word for it. Until now, that is. Mueller recently clarified his vague Twitter statement and provided a bit more insight into the change during a Google webmaster hangout by saying: “So, this is something where we made some changes in our search algorithms with regards to how we treat nofollow links. I believe the change was split into two parts, one kind of being able to pass signals through nofollow links and the other with using nofollow links for discovering new URLs.” Mueller added that this nofollow attribute change was merely a policy update, and that as far as he knows, no engineer nor anyone else at Google had actually done anything differently since the change.

“Essentially on our side the change is that internal systems are now able to do this,” said Mueller. “That doesn’t mean that internal systems are currently doing it. But at least from a policy point of view they’re able to take this on. And if there are teams within Google that say I will be able to I would want to use this then that’s something that they’re open to doing that. So, it’s possible for them to do it, it’s not the case that it’s like we’re like pumping everything full through those links now. It really depends on what teams internally are kind of testing evaluating and what makes sense for them.”

Translation – just because they can do something, doesn’t mean they will. via GIPHY When probed further and asked whether “teams are actually doing anything with that now?” Mueller added that he wasn’t sure. “They can but I don’t know,” he said. So, the takeaway here is that while the change has been in place since March 1, nobody at Google has actually made use of it yet, and they may or may not do so in the future. Thanks for the very ambiguous update, Google.

Nicole McCormick

Nicole is a wordsmith wizard, passionate about the written word and an avid storyteller who uses creatively crafted prose to help bring your brand’s story to the next level. A former journalist with writing credits in both local and national news publications and a few newspaper awards under her belt, Nicole now enjoys telling your stories and finding new and creative ways to create valuable content that resonates with audiences in the digital landscape.

Google Updates Its Guidelines for Search Quality Raters

October 20, 2021

Google has finally updated its Search Quality Raters guidelines this week after a year without any updates. For those who are unfamiliar, Google’s Search Quality Raters Guidelines offer insight into how Google assesses the quality of online content. The last update took place on October 14, 2020, and was 175 pages. The latest update saw

read more

Google Caps off Volatile Week With Another Algorithm Update

October 8, 2021

What in the world is going on with the internet this week? It was only Monday that we reported that Google had rolled out a massive unconfirmed update, and the following day, Facebook experienced a colossal outage affecting billions of people around the world. Now, Search Engine Round Table is reporting yet ANOTHER unconfirmed update

read more

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *